FREE GEOPOLITICAL NEWSLETTER

russia  

For current reports go to EASY FINDER

RUSSIA


  
  

 

In-depth Business Intelligence

Key Economic Data 
 
  2003 2002 2001 Ranking(2003)
GDP
Millions of US $ 433,491 346,520 310,000 16
         
GNI per capita
 US $ 2,610 2,140 1,750 97
Ranking is given out of 208 nations - (data from the World Bank)

Books on Russia

REPUBLICAN REFERENCE

Area (sq.km)
17,075,400

Population
143,782,338

Principal 
ethnic groups 
Russians 82%
Tatars 3.3%
Ukrainians 2.7%

Principal towns 
Moscow (capital)
St Petersburg
Novosibirsk 
Nizhni Novgorod 
Yekaterinburg 
Samara 

Currency 
Rouble

President 
Vladimir Putin



Update No: 301- (30/01/06)

Fateful conjuncture
Three remarkable events have just happened in Russia. The first is the assumption of the rotating presidency of the G8 by Russia for the first time, exercised by Putin. The second is the resignation of Andrei Illarianov, the close Kremlin aide who had acted as 'sherpa' to bring Russia into the organization, in protest at the increasing authoritarianism of the regime. The third is the crisis in gas supplies to the Ukraine, set off by a two-day stoppage. All three events occurred on or just either side of the New Year. 
Illarianov's resignation was actually sparked by the sudden squeeze in gas flows about to take effect on January 1st, after the refusal of Kiev to accept a more than fourfold jump in prices by Gazprom for strictly 'commercial reasons.' 
The puzzle is why Putin sanctioned the rise by Gazprom, now 51% owned by the state, on the day he assumed the G8 chair, when the outcry that ensued in the West was also utterly predictable. 
It appears that he expected, along with his advisers, that the West Europeans affected by any reduction in supplies in transit would blame Kiev rather than Moscow. An uncompromising statement from Berlin criticizing the squeeze was instead their lot. Angela Merkel is a very different kettle of fish than her predecessor, Gunther Shroeder, always cosying up to Moscow as chancellor and now on the board of the Gazprom venture constructing a Baltic Sea gas pipeline from Russia to Germany, by-passing Ukraine, which at present takes 80% of Russian gas westwards.
Merkel despised Shroeder already for many reasons, not least his gracelessness in defeat in clinging onto power. But the immediate acceptance of the Gazprom job by him after quitting office was the last straw; it was brazen in its refusal to belie the growing Kremlinophilia that characterized his period in office, despite hardening Russian policies, and had a whiff of corruption about it.
That appointment now looks to have already backfired for the Russians and the German Christian Democrats. 
Putin at least had the sense to back down immediately. He hardly wanted the first stage of his presidency to be dominated by him being berated by Germany's new 'Iron Lady' for allowing Russia to break faith with Ukraine. For that she could have easily done, primed with ammunition by a statement of Illiaronov's on January 2nd. He pointed out that, far from the price hike to world levels being for commercial reasons, it was actually in breach of a contact made in the summer of 2004, just before the presidential elections in Ukraine, to keep a price of US$50 per 1,000 cu m for five years until 2009. The Ukrainians curiously did not mention the matter, preferring that a Russian source should raise it first. Curious also is since this was whilst the Kuchma government before the Orange Revolution, presumably intended as an election 'bribe' to the Ukrainian elections, who nevertheless voted in a pre-western government.
The Orange Revolution then ensued, enraging the Kremlin. The political motivation of the move, revenge for the humiliation of Russia, could not be clearer. With the high-octane relentlessness characteristic of Thatcher, Angela Merkel could have shown up her male colleagues for their fawning on Putin previously, Bush, Blair and above all Berlusconi. But Putin had the sense to back off straight away; Germany is too important as a customer and investor to alienate.
Merkel is anyway the great winner from the crisis so far, showing up her predecessor and gaining stature by the day. She had just resolved the UK budget rebate dispute that concluded the UK presidency of the EU in the second half of 2005. Europe has a new stateswoman to contend with.
In fact a compromise deal was patched up on January 5th, whereby Ukraine agreed to pay US$95 per 1,000 cu m, up from the US$50 previously, but short of the US$220-230 demanded by the Russians. The payments are to be via an intermediary, RosUkrEnergo, a rather mysterious entity. It is a little-known Swiss-based joint venture owned half by Russia's gas monopoly Gazprom and half by Austria's Raiffeisen Zentralbank, whose directors prefer to remain anonymous, thus giving off the stench of corruption.
Former premier Julia Timoshenko refers to them as corrupt. When in office, she castigated RosUkrEnergo as a "criminal canker on the body" of the state energy firm, Naftogaz. As a poacher-turned-gamekeeper herself, she may well know what she is talking about.
Gazprom is to sell gas to the firm at near market rates over US$200 per 1,000 cu m, but it is allowing Turkmen gas to continue to flow to Ukraine through its pipeline system, that is to RosUkrEnergo, at the much lower previously agreed prices. The resultant mix permits the rise to be kept under double, while greatly increasing Gazprom's take.
Gazprom has also jumped its prices to Georgia, while needless to say, keeping them at US$47 per 1,000 cu m for its docile client-state, Belarus, all for strictly 'commercial considerations' of course. 

Off the record
"In many capitals, officials were quite surprised, to put it mildly," said an EU diplomat who was not authorized to speak on the record. "People were expecting, on the first day of its chairmanship, another attitude regarding relations with its neighbours and the West, particularly with regards to this commodity, energy, that's making Russia a world power." 
To many people in Western Europe, the business rationale Gazprom cited for its decision was a thin disguise for political action, punishing a new Ukrainian government for its policy of pursuing membership in the EU and NATO. 
Russia's membership in the G-8 has been controversial since its entry in the late 1990s. Recently, the issue has come back to the fore with the government's legal assault on the oil giant Yukos and a new measure that would bring grass-roots activism under greater government control. 
"Putin has shot himself in the foot," said Margot Light, a Russia specialist and professor emeritus of international relations at the London School of Economics, after the gas skirmish. "It has tarnished Russia's reputation both as chair of the G-8 and as a reliable energy supplier."

Merkel adopts hardline approach to Russia 
Ms Merkel flew into Moscow for the first time since becoming Chancellor on a visit on January 16th, but did not waste too much time on pleasantries. The German Chancellor, as we have seen, has radically altered the course of her country's foreign policy after confronting Russia's Putin on a range of difficult issues that her predecessor had studiously avoided. 
A fluent Russian speaker, thanks to her education in what was then Communist East Germany, she was the best-placed of Western leaders to take a tough line. She tackled Mr Putin on the sensitive subject of Moscow's nuclear co-operation with Iran, on the state of Russian democracy, and on the behaviour of Russian forces in Chechnya, as well as on the reliability of Russia's enormous gas supplies. 
Her forthright approach could not have been more at variance with that of her predecessor, Gerhard Shroeder, who counted Mr Putin as a close personal friend, called him a "flawless democrat", and who took a highly paid job with the Russian energy giant Gazprom after he left office. Ms Merkel has made it clear she wants to be different and did not shy from raising international concerns about a controversial new law that would strictly regulate the activities of foreign human rights organisations in Russia. She called it an "irritation" and promised she would monitor the law's effects, prompting Mr Putin to assure her in public that the lawful activities of foreign human rights group would be unaffected.
On the subject of Chechnya and alleged human rights abuses being perpetrated by Russian forces there, Ms Merkel said that the two leaders had found "no common ground," but was nevertheless upbeat about prospects for the two countries' relations.
Ms Merkel had been under serious pressure from nearly all the parties in Germany, including her own, to adopt a more critical stance on Russia that meant distancing herself from Mr Shroeder's informal relations with the Russian leader. Critics alleged that Mr Shroeder's cosy relationship with Moscow meant he remained uncritical of Russian human rights abuses while allowing Berlin's foreign policy to be dominated by Russia at the expense of Eastern Europe and Washington.
German public opinion was shocked recently by Mr Shroeder's decision to accept a key post with Gazprom. The ensuing row between Russia and Ukraine over gas supplies exacerbated German misgivings about the reliability of Moscow as an energy supplier. But Germany has little room for manoeuvre. Almost one-third of its gas is Russian and it is set to start importing even more, meaning that Ms Merkel will have to tread carefully when it comes to criticising Moscow.
Her decision to meet Russian citizens' rights groups, opposition MPs, and church leaders, at Germany's Moscow embassy was, however, an obvious attempt to show she viewed Russia differently from Mr Shroeder.
She made it clear during her visit to Washington earlier in January that she wanted to restore the TransAtlantic relationship and put an end to Russian-dominated German diplomacy.
Klaus Mangold, chairman of Germany's East-West Industry Committee, said Ms Merkel's visit was likely to bring about a key shift in Russian-German relations. "Freedom is at the centre of her political beliefs," he said. "Coming from the East, she has a different view of Russia." 

Russia; the energy power of Eurasia
The energy crisis has revealed Russia's strategy for the next decades. Russia is well placed to dominate the Eurasian energy industry for the rest of the century. It has 38% of the world's gas reserves, compared with 35% in the Middle East, while it is second only to Saudi Arabia in oil.
The first years of the century have seen a rapid energy-led boom, with GDP growth of 5% per annum sustained on average. If this is to continue, new markets must be found and old ones expanded. Gazprom is looking further afield than Ukraine to export its gas. The Baltic Sea pipeline, ready by 2020, could serve an energy-hungry Northern Europe. The UK, which now hardly takes any Russian gas, is by 2020 going to have to import 90% of its supplies, as North Sea reserves run out. A spur of the pipeline to the UK is already being envisaged. 
But it is in the central and southern countries of Europe that expansion should be the greatest. France, Italy and the various Balkan states will all require more oil and gas from Russia. The Blue Stream gas pipeline project across the Black Sea to Turkey offers a paradigm here. A spur from Blue Stream westwards or another pipeline to Bulgaria and onwards will be needed.
But in Southern Europe Russia faces tight competition from the Middle East. It is in the vast easternmost reaches of Eurasia that Russia has a huge competitive edge over anyone else, including even Kazakstan. Reserves in the Far East are not known as yet, although BP surmises that they could be so large as to make Russia the number one in reserves world-wide, with around 280bn barrels. The Chinese colossus is the obvious market, but Japan is in fierce contention to secure its vital energy resources from Siberia, both Sakhalin Island and the mainland. 
The Khodorkovsky affair gave the Japanese a boost. Yukos had been right behind a private deal with the Chinese. Indeed, it was this that was the last straw for the Kremlin. Since its former boss has been in prison and Yukos has been dismembered, it has been on the backburner, although China is far too big to ignore. The Japanese are tilting for a £3.2bn 2,200-mile pipeline from Angarsk to Nakhodka, from which oil could be exported at up to 1 million barrels per day to Japan, Korea, China and the US. The Japanese, who have only invested £550m so far in Russian oil and gas, are willing to invest another £1.1bn in exploration for more and £2.7bn in the pipeline to Nakhodka. High-tech Japanese exploration could make for a better estimate of the size of Russia's reserves.
The Chinese scheme is for an estimated £1.5bn, 1,400-mile pipeline from Angarsk to Daqing, shipping 600,000 barrels per day. It would feed the Mao-era industrial complex there. Russia produced about 8m barrels per day in 2003. It is reckoned to be able to double that within a decade, in which case both the Chinese and the Japanese markets could be satisfied. 

The case of Illarionov - key Kremlin adviser 
A strong advocate of free markets and fan of Ayn Rand who once had Putin's ear, Illarionov saw his influence diminish over the past two years. Holding on to his diminishing position, he said, "I considered it important to remain here at this post as long as I had the possibility to do something, including speaking out."
But he finally resigned in frustration at the Putin administration's increasingly authoritarian direction, which included a sharp turn away from economic liberalization. Free marketers saw Illarionov's influence as a beacon of hope for Russia's future. His departure may indicate that things in Russia have gotten worse -- but some good may yet come from it. 
The 1998 rouble collapse brought Illarionov notoriety as the first analyst to sound the alarm. He argued unsuccessfully for the government to undertake a controlled devaluation of the currency to avert a crash and warned against policy advice from the International Monetary Fund, which, he argued, set "unrealistic targets" regarding inflation, GDP growth, and trade balance. Further, "unearned financial assistance" in the form of IMF loans, he argued, created an environment of moral hazard which led the Russian government to spend and borrow excessively.
In 1999, Illarionov joined the Centre for Strategic Planning, an economic policy think tank set up by Putin. In December of that year, the Centre released its Strategy of Development for the Russian Federation to the Year 2010, co-authored by Illarionov. The document endorsed wide-ranging market reform, including deregulation of the economy and strengthening of property rights. In April 2000, Putin named Illarionov as his top economic adviser and endorsed Illarionov's proposal for a 13 per cent flat tax -- which was enacted -- and his goal of doubling the size of Russia's economy in 10 years. 
To achieve the latter, Illarionov argued, Russia would need to reject the Kyoto Protocol, which would stifle Russia's economic growth by limiting the country's use of energy. Illarionov had reason to be optimistic. In December 2003, he announced that Russia would not ratify Kyoto; President Putin did not contradict this public statement. And why tamper with success, especially if economic reform's results were starting to show -- with Russian GDP growth of 9 per cent in 2000, 5 per cent in 2001, and 4 per cent in 2002? But in November 2004, Russia ratified Kyoto in exchange for European Union support of its entry into the World Trade Organization. For Andrei Illarionov, it was a major defeat. 
And then came the Yukos affair. In October 2003, members of the FSB security force -- the successor to the KGB -- stormed the private jet of Mikhail Khodorkovsky, at the time head of oil giant Yukos and Russia's richest man. He was arrested and later charged with fraud and tax evasion. Found guilty, he was sentenced last May and is currently serving a nine-year sentence in a Siberian prison.
Critics of Putin saw Khodorkovsky's arrest and prosecution as punishment for his financial support of opposition parties. Moreover, the arrest came shortly after he acquired the publishing rights to the prestigious Miskovskiye Novosti newspaper and hired an investigative journalist critical of Putin, the BBC reported. 
Assessing the merits of the case would require another article, and Khodorkovksy, as a well-connected oligarch, hardly made for a sympathetic dissident figure. But it would be difficult for any disinterested observer to consider the Russian government's handling of the case anything but heavy handed.
In August 2004, the state seized Yukos's biggest asset, its Yuganskneftegaz oil production unit -- which at the time accounted for 60 per cent of Yukos's daily production of 1.7 million barrels -- under the justification of settling exorbitant back-tax claims which came to total over US$27 billion. In December of that year, Yukos was forced to sell Yuganskneftegaz to state-owned oil company Rosneft for US$9.4 billion.
The assault on Yukos became part of a larger trend of greater state involvement in the economy, especially in the energy sector, as state-owned companies moved to acquire more assets. The Russian state now controls around 30 per cent of the nation's oil industry.
Economically, the Yukos takeover gained the government little. Growth in oil production has slowed from an average of 9 per cent during the early years of Putin's government to around 3 per cent this year, Valery Nesterov, an energy expert with the Russian investment bank Troika Dialogue, told The Christian Science Monitor. And Illarionov notes that Yuganskneftegaz, which once pumped 1 million barrels a day, saw its production drop by at least 15 per cent between 2000 and 2003, observing that this "staggering drop in proceeds…merits being entered in the book of anti-records."
Yet for the Kremlin, there may be significant political gains form its energy sector meddling. First, the Khodorkovsky prosecution rid Putin of a powerful opponent. 
In addition, Illarionov has decried what he calls the "selective use of energy as a weapon outside Russia." Russia has used its dominance of the former Soviet energy infrastructure, such as pipelines and pumping stations, as leverage over its neighbours. 
Illarionov's public reaction to these developments was unlikely to raise his status inside the Kremlin. He was openly critical of the Khodorkovsky trial. In December 2004, he called the government's intervention into the energy sector -- including the forced sale of Yganskneftgaz and state-owned energy giant Gazprom's US$13.1 billion acquisition of the then-independent oil company Sibneft -- the "scam of the year." Days after making these remarks, Putin stripped Illarionov of his duties as Russian representative to the G8. And over the past year Illarionov found himself less listened to by Putin as the latter went in a more authoritarian direction.
"It is one thing to work in a country that is partly free," said Illarionov on the day of his resignation. "It is another thing when the political system has changed, and the country has stopped being free and democratic. I did not sign a contract with such a state, and therefore it is absolutely impossible to remain in this post." Economic freedoms may not be the only ones threatened. On December 27th, Russia's upper house approved new controls on non-governmental organizations (NGOs), including human rights groups.
So is Russia crawling back to its Soviet past? Not really. Illarionov recently said that Russia is descending into a "corporate model ruled by state corporations," in which some private firms continue to thrive, but where the state controls the economy's commanding heights. Recognizing the importance of energy to a country's future led Illarionov to oppose the Kyoto Protocol. Unfortunately, the Putin government also recognizes energy's importance, and is now seeking to utilize it for illiberal ends -- and that is bad enough. 
For Putin, it may have been better politically to keep Andrei Illarionov 'within the tent' in the hope that he would not take sides, in Michael Corleone's words, "against the family." Yet Illarionov was never afraid to criticize the president he served. It will be interesting to see how his criticisms of the Putin government shape up now that he is outside of it. 

« Top

AVIATION & SPACE

Russia agrees to transport US astronauts to ISS 

Russia and the United States agreed to transport US astronauts to the International Space Station (ISS) in exchange for payment, Russian Space Agency (Roskosmos) head, Anatoly Perminov, said. The outgoing agreement to transport the astronauts free of charge was replaced by the new agreement which was signed by Roskosmos and the US space authority, NASA, New Europe reported. 
The agreement deals with flights on board Russian spacecraft for US astronauts travelling to the ISS and back and the transport of NASA goods to the station. "A seat will be reserved on every Soyuz rocket in 2006 for a US astronaut," Perminov said without naming concrete figures for the deal. "We have our own commercial secrets," he said. 
The two sides planned to finalise a comprehensive agreement in the first half of 2006 to continue the ongoing ISS programme that is scheduled to end in 2011. Before the new agreement, US astronauts were able to fly gratis on Russian spacecraft. The arrangement ends at the end of 2005.

« Top

CREDIT RATINGS

S&P raises Interfin Trade Financial Company's ratings 

Standard & Poor's Ratings Services raised its long-term counterparty credit rating on Russia-based Interfin Trade Financial Company (IFT) to CCC from CCC-, and affirmed its C short-term counterparty credit rating on the group, New Europe reported. 
The outlook is stable, the agency said in a release. At the same time, Standard & Poor's raised its Russia national scale rating on IFT to ruB- from ruCCC+, the release said. "The upgrade reflects IFT's closer integration with parent Unicor Managing Co. and low leverage, as well as the consistent growth of the Russian securities market," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst Irina Penkina. "The ratings remain constrained, however, by IFT's narrow related-party customer base, small size, and short track record, as well as by the high sensitivity of its financial performance to the volatile domestic securities market."

S&P calls 2005 successful for Norilsk Nickel, Alrosa 

International rating agency Standard & Poor's (S&P) considers 2005 to have been a successful year for MMC Norilsk Nickel and diamond monopoly Alrosa, but also notes that risks remain that are holding back the ratings of these companies, Interfax News Agency reported.
Among companies working on the nickel, copper, precious metal and diamond markets in Russia, only these two companies have a rating from the agency: Norilsk Nickel - BB+ with stable outlook, and Alrosa - B also with stable outlook.
S&P credit analyst, Yelena Anankina, told Interfax the market conditions in 2005 resulted in an improvement in the cash flows of both companies, however an upgrade in their ratings is still being hampered by long-standing risks: for Norilsk Nickel this is the risk of doing business in Russia, common to all large private companies in Russia; and for Alrosa - the high level of debt and low level of available cash flow after capital investment. Recently another rating agency, Fitch, assigned Norilsk Nickel an investment rating. According to Anankina, S&P is not yet ready to do this due to the main risk mentioned above. "If it wasn't for the country risk, the financial situation of the company and its position on the markets, its expenditure compared with competitors - all of this is deserving of a higher rating," she said.
Speaking about the upcoming spinning off of Norilsk Nickel's gold business into the independent company Polyus, she said that this program is not likely to be significantly reflected in the diversification of the group. Commenting on what rating the future independent Polyus might receive, if its wants to receive one, Anankina said that it is difficult to estimate, however it will be significantly lower than the Norilsk Nickel rating, given the different scale of operations and diversification.
Speaking about the Alrosa business, she said that the situation on the diamond market in the past year was good, which should result in an improvement in the company's cash flows and profits. "However, its rating is currently at quite a low level because, despite growth in profitability, the company is implementing large capital investment, which is leading to growth in debt," Anankina said. Asked whether the Alrosa rating would be increased if Yakutalmaz property is included in its charter capital, she said that "everything will depend on the nature of future cash flows: social obligations taxes, rent payments." At the moment Alrosa pays Yakutia US$350 million a year for using the Yakutalmaz property.
Norilsk Nickel took steps to increase transparency in 2005 as part of the liberalization of its markets. 
Due to the liberalisation of regulation in the sector, the company disclosed information on PGM production and planned to disclose information on platinum reserves by the end of the year, and also present a strategy for developing production, however, this work has been put back until next year.
In the past year Alrosa took steps to reduce debt, at the end of 2006 its credit limit should amount to not more than US$998.6 million. The volume of investment should also fall. In addition, the company is currently starting to implement a new sales system, which will diversify exports. This program will replace export quotas for diamonds, which will be done away with, along with quotas for PGM exports, at the start of 2006.

« Top

ENERGY

Gazprom soars ahead of major listing

The market capitalisation of OAO Gazprom smashed through US$200bn as the Russian gas giant prepared to list it shares on a major Moscow exchange, the Wall Street Journal reported.
Gazprom shares, which have so far been freely available only to local investors on small exchanges, have surged 26% this year after Russia lifted restrictions imposed during the chaotic post-Soviet period to protect the state-controlled company from a foreign takeover.
A recent dispute with its Ukrainian counterpart has further underpinned the investment case for Gazprom, which provides a quarter of Europe's gas and controls 15% of the world's proven reserves, as it presses Russia's ex-Soviet neighbours to pay market prices.
Gazprom shares rose 10%, hitting a record 244.70 roubles (US$8.61), after Moscow's Russian Trading System, or RTS, said it would list Gazprom, making it accessible to more investors.
RTS previously partnered with the St Petersburg exchange to offer rouble-denominated shares in Gazprom, but trading will be conducted directly by RTS on its main dollar-denominated exchange.
The RTS benchmark index ended 3.2% higher recently, posting a new high of 1255.92, though Gazprom shares aren't likely to be included before an index re-weighting, due in March. Each stock is limited to a 15% weighting, and that means Gazprom, with a value roughly as much as Russia's next four-biggest companies combined, won't dominate.
By contrast, Gazprom is expected to make up more than 40% of Morgan Stanley Capital International's Russia index, a key benchmark for emerging-market investors.
Gazprom also plans by the end of the month to list on Russia's other main stock market, the Moscow Interbank Currency Exchange, or Micex, and has said it may seek a New York listing and issue second-level American depositary receipts as it targets a market capitalisation of US$300bn, surpassing that of BP PLC.

Gazprom to buy 30 bcm of Turkmen gas in 2006 

Turkmen President, Saparmurat Niyazov, and Russian gas giant Gazprom's CEO, Alexei Miller, on December 29th in Ashgabat signed an agreement on Turkmen natural gas shipments to Russia in 2006, Interfax News Agency reported. 
According to the agreement, Gazprom is to buy 30 billion cubic metres of gas from Turkmenistan in 2006 at 65 Euro per 1,000 cubic metres. "The operating conditions for 2007 onward will be defined in the second half of 2006 as implied by the effective contract until 2028," the release said. Earlier the price of Turkmen gas was set at 44 Euro for 1,000 cubic metres. In their statements following the signing ceremony, Niyazov and Miller stressed the importance of this document not only for the successful partnership in the gas field but for Turkmen-Russian relations as a whole and for strengthening ties of friendship and cooperation between Turkmenistan and Russia.
The Russian delegation also discussed aspects of bilateral cooperation in the gas sector in 2006 and onward. "Participants in the meeting were satisfied with the dynamic development of cooperation and the implementation of all previous understandings. The sides acknowledged the significant rise in prices on the market of fuel, materials and equipment for the oil and gas sector and agreed to adjust the price of Turkmen gas sold to Gazprom, with due consideration of these factors," a Gazprom release read. 
Niyazov also thanked the Russian leadership and Gazprom for the efforts to develop relations between the two countries and said Turkmenistan would always adhere to this partnership. "We are ready to jointly access the world markets and develop energy resources," Niyazov said.
He added, "We recently signed a contract on the delivery of 40 billion cubic metres of gas to Ukraine. The deal envisions a slightly lower price, but I think that it is just a matter of time," The government Turkmendovletkhabarlary agency quoted Niyazov as saying.

Russia, South Korea to sign gas deal soon

Gazprom expects that Russia and South Korea will sign a gas cooperation soon, the Russian gas giant's press office said after the third session of a joint working group between Gazprom and the KOGAS corporation in Seoul, New Europe reported.
The companies discussed Russian-Korean cooperation in the gas industry, especially preparation for and subsequent implementation of Russian natural gas supply projects and reached an understanding on priority steps for organising supplies.
"Both parties said they hoped their governments would soon sign the relevant intergovernmental agreement to speed up the start of full-scale commercial negotiations and the signing of contracts on deliveries of Russian natural gas to Korea," Gazprom said.
"The project to set up a unified gas production, transportation and supply system in Eastern Siberia and the Far East, which the government has appointed Gazprom to coordinate, envisages development of off-shore Sakhalin deposits, creating favourable conditions for natural and liquefied gas supplies to Korea," Gazprom deputy chairman and co-chairman of the working group, Alexander Ananenkov, said.

Rosneft to invest US$17.4bn by 2010 

Russian oil company Rosneft plans to invest US$17.4 billion in oil and gas production, oil refining and oil product trading in the period from 2006 to 2010, a source familiar with the company's production plans said, Interfax News Agency reported.
He said the company plans to invest US$14.7 billion in existing oil and gas production projects over the five-year period.
Most of these funds will go towards financing new projects, particularly the development of the Vankor group of fields in Krasnoyarsk territory. According to company calculations, investment in this project will amount to US$4.2 billion by 2010.
Investment in the company's main oil production company - OAO Yuganskneftegaz - will amount to US$6.8 billion by 2010. Investment in 2005-2009 is planned at US$1.4 billion per year, and in 2010 - US$1.2 billion.
With the implementation of the investment program, Rosneft oil and condensate production will reach 105.5 million tonnes by 2010, with natural gas production reaching 23.1 bcm, the source said.
He said that investment of US$2 billion is required in oil refining by 2010, particularly in Komsomolsk Oil Refinery (RTS: KNPR) - US$730 million, and in Tuapse Oil Refinery - US$1.36 billion. The high level of expenditure is due to Rosneft's plans to increase the volume and depth of refining at its refineries - at the Komsomolsk and Tuapse refineries yield from crude is to increase to 95% and 95.6 per cent respectively. Investment in oil product trading in 2006-2010 will amount to US$700 million.

« Top

MINERALS & METALS

Norlisk Nickel schedules 1st Polyus gold meeting

MMC Norlisk Nickel's board of directors has scheduled the founding meeting of OJSC Polyus Gold, the company into which Norlisk's gold mining assets will be spun off, for March 3rd, Norlisk Nickel said recently, New Europe reported.
The agenda will include electing a board of directors for Polyus Gold, appointing a director and audit commission and approving the company's charter.
The meeting will also approve statutes on the board of directors and shareholders' meeting and name an external auditor. Shareholders registered as of January 1st 2006 will be entitled to participate in the meeting.
Meanwhile, shareholders in MMC Norlisk Nickel will hold an extraordinary meeting on February 17th, the Arctic mining and smelting giant said in a press release.
Norlisk Nickel said that the shareholders would vote on charter amendments needed to reduce charter capital by approximately 11 per cent. Charter capital will be reduced by a block of approximately five per cent of the shares that the company bought back from shareholders who did not vote on or who voted against spinning the company's gold mining assets off (these shares have already been cancelled de facto); and 5.8 per cent which the company bought back earlier in the year. Shareholders registered as of January 1st 2006 will be entitled to vote.
Shareholders voted at a September 30th EGM in favour of spinning off gold production assets in order to consolidate Norlisk Nickel's gold assets as well as its 20 per cent share in Gold fields into a separate company. Shareholders with 65.25 per cent of total voting shares took part in the meeting and 99 per cent of them backed the spin-off. The Law on Joint Stock Companies entitles shareholders who did not vote or who vote against to tender their shares for buy-back. Norlisk Nickel bought the shares for 1,855 roubles per share or a total of 20.03bn roubles between November 24th and December 14th.
Norlisk Nickel also bought back 12.5m shares or 5,8 per cent of its stock at 1,680 roubles a share from shareholders at the start of 2005.
Four companies with Interros chief Vladimir Potanin and Norlisk Nickel CEO, Mikhail Prokhorov, as their beneficiaries sold 1.22 per cent of Norlisk Nickel each or a total of 4.88 per cent of the stock as part of the buy-back.
In addition, Prokhorov sold some of the shares that he owned direct back to the company, reducing his directly owned stake to 0.296 per cent from 0.374 per cent. Interros participated in the sale of the remaining 0.92 per cent (or the 5.8 per cent) sold under the buy-back offer. Norlisk Nickel's charter capital is currently 213.9m roubles and consists of 213,905,884 shares with par value of one rouble.

Irkutsk gold production down 2.3% in 2005 

Russia's Irkutsk region produced just over 15.2 tonnes of gold in 2005, down 2.3 per cent from 2004, a source in the regional administration said, Interfax News Agency reported.
The source said that production fell due to a drop in production of placer gold, unfavourable weather conditions and the depletion of reserves. The Lenzoloto holding company, a placer gold producer which is part of MMC Norilsk Nickel's Polyus gold mining division, mined 7.012 tonnes of gold. Lenzoloto's Svetly and Lensib units mined 2.059 tonnes and 1.363 tonnes respectively.
The Lena and Vitim mining cooperatives produced 881.6 kilograms and 2.735 tonnes of placer gold respectively. 
The Irkutsk region produced a total of 12.686 tonnes of placer gold in 2005. The region doubled lode gold production to 2.498 tonnes in 2005. ZAO Sukhoi Log, a subsidiary of Lenskaya Gold Company, another Polyus unit that produces lode gold, mined 420 kilograms of gold at the Zapadnoye field. Lenskaya subsidiary ZAO Tonoda mined 50 kilograms of lode gold. Sukhoi Log fell short of its quota to produce 800 kilograms in 2005 because the recovery plant at Zapadnoye was stopped for technical reasons in October.
But the company hopes to be producing 1.3 tonnes of gold in 2006 as its recovery plant goes back on stream. 
Lode gold producer OAO Vysochaishy, which is controlled by Moscow-based Lanta-Bank, produced 2.028 tonnes of gold in 2005. The region reduced gold production 6 per cent to 15.555 tonnes in 2004. The region's overall quota to produce gold was 19.51 tonnes in 2005.

MMK to launch air separator in spring 2007 

OAO Magnitogorsk Iron & Steel Works plans to launch a new air separator in spring 2007, the company's press service said recently, New Europe reported.
The company is currently preparing a site for the new unit, which will be the company's tenth such unit and the best in the company's oxygen plant. The Moscow region company Kriogenmash, with which Magnitogorsk energy companies have been working for many years, won a tender to supply equipment and signed a contract in March this year. 
The statement said the "Kriogenmash equipment matches its foreign analogues as regards its technical parameters, but is significantly cheaper." The unit will have a capacity for 35,000 cubic meters of oxygen and 30,000 cubic meters of nitrogen per year. The unit will also produce argon, demand for which is growing in the metallurgy industry every year. With the launch of the ninth block, the oxygen saturation of new MMK production will increase. The air products will primarily be supplied to the electric steel smelting complex. At the moment up to 45 cubic meters of high-quality oxygen is required to produce a tonne of electric steel, the press service said.

« Top

SHIPPING

Novoship plans to raise net profit 42% in 2005 

Novorossiisk Shipping Company (Novoship) is planning for its consolidated net profit to grow 41.9 per cent to US$230 million in 2005, a source in the company's board of directors said, Interfax News Agency reported.
Based on preliminary forecasts, the company expects revenue to grow to more than US$330 million. Novoship forecasts that it will have shipped 58 million tonnes of goods by the end of 2005.
The Novoship board of directors on December 23rd approved a programme for renovating its fleet by 2008, the source said. Between now and 2008, the company will acquire 18 more ships, including 10 ships in 2006 alone.
Novoship said earlier that it would receive US$250 million in profit from operational activities in 2005 and US$260 million in 2006.
The company had consolidated net profit to International Accounting Standards (IAS) of US$162.9 million in 2004. Novoship doubled its net profit to IAS in the first half of 2005, bringing it to US$176 million after it sold 10 tankers.
The main shareholders in Novoship are the Federal Property Agency (Rosimushchestvo) with 60.73 per cent, the Russian Federal Property Fund with 6.4 per cent, OAO Novoshipinvest with 8.49 per cent and Intrigue Shipping with 14.41 per cent.

« Top

TOURISM

Russia's high hopes for ski resort

From mid-December through to the end of May, the picturesque slopes not far from Russia are typically caked with a generous layer of white power perfect for downhill skiing, and the lift tickets are only US$25, the Wall Street Journal reports.
Unfortunately for foreign ski buffs, all the signs are in Cryrilllic and it is about 180 miles away from a festering civil war.
The slopes, in a sleepy southern village known as Krasnaya Polyana, have long been popular with Russian skiers. Now, eager to share in the tourism riches that go to alpine nations, Russian investors are trying to transform Krasnaya Polyana into the country's first world-class ski resort. They are in the process of adding new slopes, lifts and luxury hotels and plan to add a lot more of each over the next decade.
It is also a pet project of Russian President, Vladimir Putin, who often stays at a dacha, or country home, in the area and skis at Krasnaya Polyana every year. He is, in fact, planning to make the resort a centrepiece of a Russian bid for the 2014 Winter Olympics.
The quest to become a prestige skiing destination mirrors Russia's broader ambition to show the world that it is back as a global power. In July it will for the first time host the G-8 meetings, an important showcase event. And, instead of going around the world looking for loans and other assistance, as it has in past years, Russia, now rich with oil, is aggressively paying off its debt.
On another level, the ski-resort idea is part of Russia's effort re-build its tourism industry, which thrived during the soviet era, when people weren't allowed to travel to the West, but has withered as the country has opened up. With Russia now in its sixth straight year of economic growth, more people here are taking overseas trips.
Sochi, the Black Sea summer resort town about an hour from Krasnaya Polyana, has long been a destination for the country's movers and shakers - going back to the tome of the czars. Every winter, thousands of Russians from Moscow and St Petersburg, often clad in massive fur coats, conspicuous jewellery and the other totems of the country's young nouveau riche, fly in to schmooze and hit the slopes at Krasnaya Polyana. But noticeably absent are the foreign ski vacationers who are a staple at resorts like Tahoe or Chamonix.
Kremlin-friendly tycoons and companies have taken the hint and are now pouring money into the area. Roman Abramovich, the governor of a Russian province and owner of the high-profile Chelsea soccer club in England, is building a US$100m ski resort. Another resort in the works will include 20 ski lifts ascending to a 2,400-metre peak, about 69 kilometres of trails, and accommodation for around 6,000 people. Ultimately, the larger Krasnaya Polyana development will cost more than a billion dollars. Among the other investors are the Canadian based Ecosign Mountain Resort Planners, which currently is working on more than 10 different resort projects in Russia, and Interros, a group controlled by tycoon Vladimir Potanin.
For foreign tourists, Russia is in some ways an easy sell. It is a trove of art and culture, from Lenin's tomb and the Hermitage to the czar's Winter Palace, and the top hotels and restaurants in Moscow are now on par with their peers in Europe. But that's only part of the story. Outside the top cities, the infrastructure tends to be creaky and the service nonexistent.
Some restaurants that have credit-card signs on their doors announce only after the bill has arrived that credit cards aren't, in fact accepted. Major streets are often without lights and museums are known to close without warning - for "repairs." Then there are the visa requirements: You have to go through the extra step of getting an "invitation" letter - the cost differs widely, depending on how fast you need it and where you get it but is often in the neighbourhood of US$40 - to get a visa.
The idea with Krasnaya Polyana is to create an oasis from these hassles. The lure: glitzy new resorts, challenging slopes (many of which have been newly clear-cut) and affordable prices for everything from fine dining to lift tickets, especially when compared to resorts in the US and Western Europe.
Despite Russia's size, this slice of land next to the Black Sea is the country's only serious spot for downhill skiing - the Ural Mountains, for example, are more akin to hills. But Russia's southern Caucasian border is a long way from Munich or London, not to mention Chicago. And it is only 180 miles from Chechnya, the site of a long-simmering civil war.
The nearest airport to Krasnaya Polyana is in Sochi, where dogs snooze on the runway and taxi drivers crowd in the exit. The regional government says that a new state-of-the-art airport, under construction for a decade and dogged by delays, will finally open.
In the summer, Sochi's verdant parks and pebble beaches teem with sun worshippers who crowd the many pleasant outdoor restaurants and reserve every last room in the city's dozens of high-rise hotels.
Stalin's famous forest-green dacha is in Sochi, and by spring, the fortress home where Stalin ruled the Soviet Union fro three decades will become a luxury hotel, restaurant and in a tiny corner, a museum.

Polymetal receives prospecting licence

MNPO Polymetal, Russia's biggest silver producer and second biggest gold producer, has received a licence to prospect and appraise reserves of the Galkinsky lode gold section in the Sverdlovsk region, the company said recently, New Europe reported.
Polymetal itself asked the local natural resources department to list the property as being available. Polymetal's North Urals Gold subsidiary received the licence, which is valid until December 1st 2010, as the only contender.
The reserves contain a probable 15-20 tonnes or 480,000640,000oz of gold with ore graded at 4 g/t got AU.
The property measures 3.5 square kilometres and is 26km from North Ural Gold's Vorontsovstkoye gold mine.
Polymetal aims to have the new property's reserves appraised by 2008. Polymetal thinks the field could be mined by the open cast method and processed by cyanide heap leaching.
"Obtaining the licence to the Galkinsky section is an important aspect of the company's development strategy, to bolster and increase its resource base and form a new generation of assets," Polymetal said.
"Given the availability of developed infrastructure and the successful experience of work in the Sverdlovsk region, we expect that Galkinsky will in time serve as a supplementary resource base for the Vorontsovskoye mine and produce a major synergic effect," the release quoted Viktor Nesis, general director of Polymetal Management Company, as saying. Polymetal aims to expedite exploration under existing licences and to bid at tenders for new licence in the regions in which it operates today.
Polymetal, established in 1998, includes the Polymetal Management Company, Polymetal Engineering, four mining enterprises and four geological enterprises in Buryatia, the Khabarovsk territory, Sakhalin Irkutsk, Chita and Magadan regions. Polymetal holds nine precious metal mining and exploration licences.

« Top

« Back

 


 
Published by 
Newnations (a not-for-profit company)
PO Box 12 Monmouth 
United Kingdom NP25 3UW 
Fax: UK +44 (0)1600 890774
enquiries@newnations.com