For current reports go to EASY FINDER




Key Economic Data 
  2003 2002 2001 Ranking(2003)
Millions of US $ 80,574 77,076 71,400 43
GNI per capita
 US $ 1,080 1,020 1,050 135
Ranking is given out of 208 nations - (data from the World Bank)

Books on The Philippines


Area ( 



Philippine peso (PHP) 



Update No: 035 - (04/12/06)

Constitutional change continues to dominate the political agenda despite a Supreme Court ruling denying "with finality" the proposal to change the constitution by means of a people's initiative (this issue was dealt with at length in our last report). 

The Supreme Court ruling was handed down on October 25 and, as expected the Sigaw ng Bayan (Clamour of the Nation) alliance and the Union of Local Authorities of the Philippines asked the Supreme Court to reconsider its decision. Again as expected this application was rejected by the Court. Perhaps, the surprising aspect in the rejection was the speed with which the justices deliberated. But with the vote being just 8-7 in favour of rejection (and with the same ratio maintained in the final decision), time was of the essence. The present Chief Justice is due to retire on December 6. Had the court ruled after the event and with a new Chief appointed by the president, the vote could have gone the other way.
Also surprising was the acrimonious response of House Speaker Mr. Jose de Venecia to the decision. Basically Mr. de Venecia accused the justices of forgetting that they "owed him" favours and asking why they did not repay past favours by voting the way the government wanted. In one short breath, that vent of spleen displayed the transactional nature of the debate. It is not about consideration of issues on their merits. Rather it is all about calling in favours to achieve political ends.
One has to worry about the future direction the Supreme Court may take. So far, it is the one arm of government that has remained relatively untainted. That could easily change.

The debate is far from over. Still the pro-administration members of the lower chamber of Congress claim the "clamour of charter change" and President Arroyo appears only too ready to accommodate them. With the Senate by and large opposed to the idea of a unicameral assembly that would result in its own abolition, the members of the lower house now appear to be keen to go it alone and turn itself into a constituent assembly that would deliberate and approve proposals to amend the Constitution to bring about a unicameral parliamentary system in the Philippines after President Arroyo steps down in 2010.
December 6, the same date as the opening of the ASEAN Summit meetings in Cebu, has been targeted as the date for the assembly to convene. This may have been done deliberately as a means of drawing attention away from the debate.

Part of the tactic of Malacañang Palace appears to be the postponement, if not the outright abolition of the nationwide mid-term polls scheduled for May 10 next year. Ostensibly this is to give legislators ample time to complete the process of charter change although most people believe President Arroyo to fear the poll result. Even with an announced Php1.27 billion war chest most pundits believe that President Arroyo would be hard pressed to win a decisive victory for her supporters and that a poor showing by her supporters in the polls would almost certainly rebound on her presidency. The other reason is probably that she wants to save her war chest for her to win the campaign on charter change. 
There things stand. The bulk of the people of the Philippines remain opposed to changing the constitution - at least in the manner proposed which will only serve to perpetuate the present power elite but in this vibrant democracy that does not faze anyone. According to a recent poll, more than two-thirds of the people would vote "no" if a plebiscite on charter change was held tomorrow. But why should the will of the people stand in the way of the wants of the political class? One thing is for sure, the debate next year will be long and acrimonious and will do nothing to help grow the economy and bring in the foreign investment needed.

Is the economy moving sideways?
Both the World Bank and the IMF have recently upgraded their outlook for the economic performance of the Philippines.
Citing the country's improved fiscal performance, the recovery of agriculture and exports and the slowing inflation because of softening world crude prices, the bank projected a gross domestic product growth of 5.5 percent for the country in 2006, up from its original forecast of 5.3 percent. Likewise, the World Bank revised upward its 2007 growth estimate for the Philippines to 5.7 percent from 5.6 percent, despite the expected growth slowdown in major economies such as China and Japan. This is in line with its regional forecast for East Asian economies, which are expected to register their fifth consecutive year of strong growth in 2006, back up by a substantial decline in poverty.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has taken the same tack in raising its growth estimate for the Philippines for this year and next. "The growth outlook has become more favourable," the IMF said in a statement. 
"The Philippines' growth prospects have improved and sentiment on the Philippines is quite bullish. Exports are doing better and agriculture is better," IMF head of mission Gordon James said.
The IMF now predicts that the Philippine economy would grow by 5.5 percent in 2006 and by 5.8 percent in 2007. "Exports are growing faster than expected and the outlook for investment has improved. Raising growth further over the medium term is key to substantially raising living standards and decisively reducing poverty," it said. It also said it expected inflation to slow to 6.3 percent in 2006 and 4 percent in 2007, lower than its earlier forecasts of 6.7 percent for this year and 5 percent for next year. The IMF said inflation continued to ease due to a stronger peso and lower oil prices.

On fiscal reforms, the IMF said while the government was likely to beat this year's budget deficit goal of PhP125 billion (US$2.5 billion), or 2.1 percent of gross domestic product, authorities had to accelerate tax administration reforms. This may prove to be a conservative call.
The Philippines incurred a budget deficit of PhP5.8 billion in October, which was lower than expected, and the government now expects the full-year budget shortfall to come well below the original forecast. With the latest monthly deficit figure, Finance Secretary Margarito Teves said that he was confident that the 2006 budget gap will hit a range of PhP105 billion to PhP115 billion, or 1.7 percent of gross domestic product, significantly lower than the original ceiling of PhP125 billion, or 2.1 percent of GDP.
Despite all of this positive news, the economy is sending out mixed signals. According to the latest data manufacturing output in volume terms continues to decline and in September 2006 was 8.3 percent below the level of a year ago. This was well below the level for the second quarter, the figures for which were updated yielding higher growth rates of 5.8% for GDP and 6.7% for GNP.
Gross domestic product or GDP rose by only 4.8 percent in the 3rd quarter, a rate similar to that of a year ago. On the other hand, gross national product rose by 5.8 percent as net factor income from abroad remained strong, up by 17.1%. 

Despite the optimism of the business sector (business confidence is at a five-year high according to reports) investments are failing to keep pace with GDP growth. According to the National Economic and Development Agency (NEDA) further reform aimed at improving the country's business climate is needed if the contribution of investments to overall economic growth is to improve. According to NED Director General, Romulo Neri, the investment to GDP ratio has fallen to 14.5 percent from 19.5 percent recorded five years ago. The GDP in 2005 stood roughly at Php5.3 trillion at current prices.
So has the Philippines turned the corner in 2006? At this stage the answer has to be "probably not", the country's politicians are playing the same old game and the economy is left playing second fiddle and never quite making centre stage. "Muddling through" continues to be the best we can hope for.

« Top


« Back


Published by 
Newnations (a not-for-profit company)
PO Box 12 Monmouth 
United Kingdom NP25 3UW 
Fax: UK +44 (0)1600 890774