|
Books on Russia

|
Update No: 318 (27/06/07)
There is a fear in the air of a new cold war, just when the
countries of the world need to get together to combat a common peril - global
warming. Russia and the West are falling out again over everything, Iraq,
climate change and the right way to combat terrorism, for the former to squelch
the Chechens in the Caucasus, for the latter to put anti-missile batteries in
its newest allies in the Czech Republic and Poland. But in one area of
international concern RUSSIA by making a decisive intervention in the stalled
matter of the North Korean decommissioning of their Yongbyon nuclear reactor,
has removed a log-jam (which is fully described in our NORTH KOREA report). This
of course is not just a matter of aiding the west. Russia is a member of the 6
Party group that has laboriously been seeking for years to find solutions to the
problems set by North Korea. Obviously Russia does not need an unpredictable
nuclear-armed neighbour on its frontier.
Doubts over Russia missiles offer
After months of escalating tensions between Washington and Moscow over US plans
for a missile defence shield in Europe, President Vladimir Putin surprised
George W. Bush at the G8 summit in early June with an offer to co-operate with
the US. One thing is abundantly clear. Putin has a far more nimble brain than
Bush and is not likely to be caught napping by the Texan cowboy.
At the G8 summit on June 7th, Mr Putin proposed that the US and Russia jointly
host part of the system at a former Soviet radar station in Azerbaijan. He added
on June 8th that, instead of Poland, the US could host interceptors in Turkey,
Iraq, or at sea. What could be more reasonable, if the real objective is to
contain Iran.
While Bush initially welcomed the offer, which for good manners he was obliged
to do, it was unclear if Russia was making a serious proposal that the US could
accept. The Pentagon wants to install 10 missile interceptors in Poland and a
powerful radar in the Czech Republic. The US does, indeed, say that the system
is aimed at missile threats from Iran. Moscow says there is no imminent threat
from Iran, suggesting that the system is aimed at Russia, which of course it is.
The Czech Republic was generally favourable toward Mr Putin's offer, relieved
that Russia appeared to have accepted that there is a danger of a potential
missile attack from rogue states. 'Appeared' is the key word here; Moscow is
totally convinced that the shield is directed at Russia and hopes to demonstrate
the fact by suggesting alternatives closer to the rogue states, which Washington
will refuse, making clear to the world what its real intentions are. In Poland,
the reaction was muted, although Anna Fotyga, the foreign minister, said Russian
threats were prompting Poland to strengthen its military potential, thereby
letting the cat out of the bag. Of course it is all about containing Russia,
which has plenty of missiles all right and the means to deliver them.
Indeed, Moscow is upgrading its nuclear arsenal, developing the RS-24. It could
rain missiles down on the EU, if it wanted to, but this would of course be an
absurd thing to do - and isn't going to happen.
US and Russian officials are expected to meet later to discuss the Russian idea.
But questions already exist as to whether the Russian proposal would be a
substitute for the US plans. The radar in Azerbaijan, for example, is not the
kind of radar the US wants to place in the Czech Republic. "It is an early
warning radar there, not an X-band of the type we are proposing for the Czech
Republic, but that type of radar can be used to cue [point] an X-band at a
hostile missile," said Richard Lehner, spokesman for the US Missile Defence
Agency.
It is also not clear whether the US would be willing to give up the idea of
putting missile interceptors in Poland, which the Pentagon says is the best
location in Europe. Indeed, if the threat is from Russia after all, which the
Poles believe; why should the Iranians have it in for them?
Mr Putin said that the radar in Azerbaijan "completely covers the whole
region that worries the Americans." But Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, Nato
secretary general, suggested that the proximity of Iran made Mr Putin's proposal
less feasible, a bizarre claim if ever there was one.
While Mr Putin also suggested sea-based interceptors, the US is several years
away from even testing long-range missile interceptors, although they are in
development.
While military experts debate the technical merits of using Azerbaijan as a
forward radar base, Russia's offer is possibly more significant in geo-strategic
terms if it leads to a closer partnership with the US in countering Iran's
emergence as a regional power.
For Azerbaijan, the development could fit nicely with Baku's strategy of
courting ties with both Moscow and Washington, but runs the risk of antagonising
Iran, which is said by opposition members in Azerbaijan to be already active in
backing Islamists there.
Clearly a contentious business. Everybody bar the frank Polish foreign minister,
is engaging in double-talk.
The multiple cover-up
There is a sub-story concerning missing extant weapons waiting to come out
perhaps, that would be excruciatingly embarrassing for world powers in the West
and for others, above all Russia, in the East. It would need there to have been
a multiple cover-up going on about WMDs. What the ultimate story is - who knows,
but it is fruitful material for conspiracy theorists.
This is exactly the sort of thing that is said as a preamble to every conspiracy
theory of course. But conspiracies take place. Hitler hatched his war with just
such a one, pretending to have been attacked by Poland. His officers tried and
failed to get rid of him several times in another conspiracy. What is noticeable
about this tale is how it began with just colossal incompetence; and a criminal
conspiracy only came later.
At least this would be so if the story is true. The reluctance of those involved
to investigate the matter further is suspicious. But then they all come badly
out of it - or are frightened that they do.
It is an historical fact that Saddam sent 129 planes to Iran in 1991, just
before the war began. This was extraordinary, given the recent war he had waged
against them. but they were of course the enemy of his own new enemy, the US.
The planes would certainly have been destroyed otherwise by coalition air
forces, in Gulf War I. Thinking at the time seemed to speculate that he believed
that he might get them back after the war was over - he didn't.
The present claim is that somehow Saddam's WMDs found their way into Iranian
(and for good measure, Syrian) hands. It would infer an extreme instance of
misprision by the US - that is of neglect of its official duty and incompetence
in its execution, and concealment of the same thereafter. It also suggests a
massive case of geopolitical trickery and treachery to civilised values by
Russia.
The pith is - the Americans failed to remove WMDs from Iraq in mid-2003, which
did, indeed, exist; while the Russians provided vital assistance to the Syrians
to extract them from bunkers under the Euphrates and elsewhere and to dispatch
them to Syria, a rogue and terrorist state by US definition, and to Iran,
another.
It is possible that this happened deliberately before the war broke out.
The prevailing wisdom is that Saddam meekly complied with the US/UN demand that
he relinquish his WMDs. The theory is that it is more likely he gave them to his
own closest allies, the Russians, who would have liked to score off the
Americans and by the Syrians and Iranians also having their share?
Did the Foreign Office advise Blair that he was wasting his time in going to
Moscow in mid-2003 to try and persuade Putin to switch sides on the war? The
late Saddam regime was a Russian client state. Putin refused to support the
action and asked where then are the WMDs?
Perhaps he knew better than Blair where they were and who now had them - if he
and the 'axis of evil' states did!
Saddam would then have had the last laugh from the grave. So goes the
speculation, what some may say sounds more like a last ditch Cheneyite
explanation - a few years late - to account for there being no WMDs there to
find, when Iraq was finally occupied.
It may have been a mistake to underestimate Saddam's capacity for mischief, his
powers of duplicity or his cunning. It does seem hardly probable that he would
divest himself of his entire arsenal of WMDs, in which he had invested billions,
without extracting some advantage from it. That may be sufficient reason that
such a theory could be even worth the reading.
Moscow and London fall out
As Tony Blair prepares to depart from office, his relationship with Putin
has reached a nadir. He was the first Western leader to embrace Putin in 2000
when he became president, accepting that the war in Chechnya was justified
because the insurgents were terrorists. He naively expected Putin to reciprocate
over his own and Bush's war in Iraq, which under Saddam was a virtual client
state of the USSR's and then Russia's.
Blair's courting of Putin in no wise enhanced the UK's standing in the Kremlin;
indeed it diminished it. When Blair made a trip to Moscow in 2003 to persuade
Putin that there were indeed WMDs in Iraq, the Russian leader berated him in
public like an errant schoolboy, demanding proof.
Blair has a passion for giving hostages to fortune in this regard. He seems
completely incapable of grasping that his perceived poodle status vis-a-vis the
US made him the ideal butt to work off anti-American feeling by world leaders,
who want to retain a semblance of good relations with Washington (although that
is no longer the case with Putin who has become openly hostile to the
Americans).
Relations between London and Moscow fell to their lowest level in almost 20
years on May 22nd after Russia refused to hand over a "businessman"
accused of poisoning the former KGB officer Alexander Litvinenko. The Crown
Prosecution Service said police had gathered sufficient evidence to justify
charging Andrei Lugovoi with murder and demanded that he be extradited to stand
trial for an "extraordinarily grave" crime. A spokesman for Tony Blair
said: "Murder is murder: this is a very serious case."
But in a swift response, Russia said there was no chance of Mr Lugovoi being
sent to stand trial in Britain, and warned of a political backlash. Marina
Gridneva, a spokeswoman for the Russian prosecutor general's office, said:
"Under Russian law, a citizen of the Russian Federation cannot be handed
over to a foreign country."
Mr Lugovoi spoke to Russian state-run television and Channel 4 news to insist he
had nothing to do with Litvinenko's death. "I can say that I am absolutely
calm as I am absolutely innocent," he told Channel 4. "I...am
convinced that I did not kill Litvinenko. Moreover, I am fully and deeply
convinced that British justice does not have any evidence. I also do not
understand how they will claim I had a motive, and if there's no motive, it's
difficult to imagine they have a case." He said the decision to charge him
was "political".
The Kremlin has also denied repeated assertions by friends of Litvinenko that it
was behind his murder.
But British security and intelligence officials believe that former, and
possibly serving, agents of the Russian state were behind the murder. They say
that only a state institution could produce polonium-210, the highly refined
radioactive product used to poison Litvinenko.
The decision to seek the extradition of Mr Lugovoi was predicted by the Guardian
in January. Since then there are understood to have been a number of discussions
about the move at Cobra, the government's emergencies committee.
Peter Ricketts, permanent secretary at the Foreign Office, summoned the Russian
ambassador, Yuri Fedotov, for a meeting. Margaret Beckett, the foreign
secretary, later said: "This was a serious crime. We are seeking and expect
full cooperation from the Russian authorities in bringing the perpetrator to
face British justice. These points were made strongly to the Russian ambassador
when he was called into the Foreign Office."
The Foreign Office believes it can continue to cooperate with Russia on other
issues. "We work closely with them on international challenges, on Iraq and
climate change," said a spokeswoman. But on this "serious crime...we
expect cooperation from Russia," she said.
Russia signed the European convention on extradition in 2001. "Whether it's
Russia or other countries there are certain legal obligations that countries
have," said Tony Blair's official spokesman. "Let's see what the legal
response is."
The murder accusation comes at a time when relations between Britain and Russia
are strained. In a speech last year, Vladimir Putin, Russia's president, laid
out his foreign policy goals and called for relations to be strengthened with
the "leading" EU countries of Italy, France, Germany and Spain.
Britain was not mentioned. A few months earlier Russia's Federal Security
Service, the FSB, accused four British diplomats of spying.
The Kremlin is also angry that Britain has given refuge to Boris Berezovsky, an
influential Kremlin insider under former president Boris Yeltsin who fell out
with Mr Putin and fled to Britain in 2000. In April Mr Berezovsky told the
Guardian that he was plotting a coup to topple Mr Putin in an interview which
prompted the Kremlin to renew its attempts to have him extradited to Moscow.
Gleb Pavlovsky, a consultant to Mr Putin, said: "'A situation in which
Britain doesn't give us Berezovsky, but asks for people affiliated with
Berezovsky to be handed over will definitely not arouse enthusiasm in Moscow. If
this story develops it will seriously damage the attitude of the Russian elite
towards Britain and the West. The West is trying to criminalize the image of
Russia."
Other analysts warned of a possible backlash in Russia against the UK. Boris
Makargenko, director of Moscow's Centre for Political Technologies, said:
"I hope there will be no anti-British hysteria. But I'm certain some people
will say the Brits are plotting against Russia. It's inevitable, Russia will not
extradite Lugovoi. "
Litvinenko, 43, a former spook become political refugee, who had acquired
British citizenship, was a critic of the Kremlin, which he accused of being
behind the deadly wave of apartment block bombings eight years ago which stoked
support for a renewed offensive against Chechen separatists.
He was poisoned during a meeting in the bar of the Millennium Hotel in Mayfair
on November 1 last year, dying 22 days later. Before he died, scientists working
alongside Scotland Yard detectives realised he had swallowed a massive dose of
polonium-210, a rare radioactive isotope.
A colourless and odourless substance which cannot be picked up by radiation
scanners at airports, polonium-210 appeared to have been chosen as the murder
weapon because the chances of it being detected were so slim. But once it was
discovered in Litvinenko's urine, Scotland Yard was able to map out a detailed
picture of every step the killer took before and after the murder.
This led the CPS to conclude that there was enough evidence to charge Mr Lugovoi
- another 'former' or perhaps current spook, not resident in Britian, with
murder. Sir Ken Macdonald, the director of public prosecutions, said: "I
have today concluded that the evidence sent to us by the police is sufficient to
charge Andrei Lugovoi with the murder of Mr Litvinenko by deliberate
poisoning... I have instructed CPS lawyers to take immediate steps to seek the
early extradition of Andrei Lugovoi from Russia to the United Kingdom, so that
he may be charged with murder, and be brought swiftly before a court in
London."
The British are well aware that there is zero chance of the Russians handing
over Lugovoi, just as there is zero of them handing over Berezovsky. They have
decided to make a subtle, if only symbolic, gesture. The judge who refused
extradition of Berezovsky to Russia in 2003, Timothy Workman, has been given a
Commandership of the British Empire (CBE). To make it even more pointed, the
leading defector from the KGB to the UK in the Cold War, Oleg Gordievski, a
long-time adviser to the Foreign Office on Russian affairs, has been made a
Companion of St Michael and St George (CMG).
This is not likely to perturb Putin too much. Where is there a British empire
left to command? And who wants the companionship of two long-dead saints?
However, he knows these things matter in Britain.
Documentary about poisoned spy Alexander Litvinenko to screen at Cannes
A documentary about poisoned Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko had its world
premiere at the Cannes Film Festival at the end of May.
"Rebellion: The Litvinenko Case," was screened at the festival on May
26th, a decision the movie's director, Andrei Nekrasov, said was made at least
three weeks beforehand - well before British prosecutors named Andrei Lugovoi as
a suspect in Litvinenko's murder and demanded his extradition from Russia.
Nekrasov said it was the festival organizers' idea to keep the film a secret
until now. "I can't say the reason was political pressure," Nekrasov
told The Associated Press. "They do this sort of surprise screening
sometimes."
Nekrasov, a friend of Litvinenko, said the film would give audiences an insight
into the minds of those who killed him. "It's for the police and
prosecutors where the trail of polonium leads," he said. "What is
important is to understand the motives and the context." The film draws on
footage of Litvinenko shot over four years, as well as interviews with his
widow, Marina, and others.
"I'm not treating him uncritically," Nekrasov said. "You know, I
think people will be walking out with a very clear idea where my personal
sympathies are, but I am trying to be objective - but also emotional. I wanted
to make a documentary which goes beyond information, and which looks deeper into
people's motives - without which we will never understand why he was
killed."
«
Top
AUTOMOBILES
Nissan to construct St. Petersburg plant
Nissan Motor Co. is planning to launch construction on an automotive plant
outside of St. Petersburg on July 8th, Nissan Motor Rus, the company's Russian
branch, said in a statement, cited by Interfax News Agency.
A groundbreaking ceremony was initially planned for June 8th, but the start of
construction was then postponed due to changes in the schedule of events at the
St. Petersburg International Economic Forum and the schedules of members of the
government and the City of St. Petersburg.
Nissan will initially produce one model at its factory in St. Petersburg,
although it could produce three or four in time, Fujio Hosaka, managing director
of Nissan Manufacturing Rus, said earlier. Production should start in January
2009, Hosaka said. The plant is being built in the Kamenka industrial zone
outside St. Petersburg.
Maxim Sokolov, chairman of the St. Petersburg committee for investment and
strategic projects, said earlier that the planned volume of investment in the
construction of the Nissan plant in the period to 2009 amounts to about 5.5
billion roubles. The plant will be able to produce about 50,000 automobiles per
year.
Auto maker GAZ ups IFRS earnings 94% in 2006
The GAZ automobile group boosted net profit to International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS) of 94 per cent in 2006 to 6 billion roubles, the company said
in a press release, cited by Interfax News Agency.
Sales revenue grew 26 per cent to 118.793 billion roubles. Analysts forecast net
profit of 4.117 billion roubles and revenue of 112.071 billion roubles. Car
sales came to 80.37 billion roubles, and bus, diesel engine and fuel apparatus
sales to 16.231 billion roubles. Truck sales soared 68 per cent to 11.474
billion roubles, and construction and road machinery sales grew 60 per cent to
6.604 billion roubles. Gross profit rose 33 per cent in 2006 to 23.24 billion
roubles, and earnings before tax 72 per cent to 8.548 billion roubles.
GAZ said that sales revenue to IFRS grew 30 per cent year-on-year in the first
quarter of 2007 to 30 billion roubles. All segments but cars, small and large
buses saw growth. Sales of light commercial vehicles grew 21 per cent to 40,049,
and medium truck sales rose 47 per cent to 6,647. Sales of these vehicles are
expected to hit 200,000 this year as a whole.
«
Top
AVIATION
Boeing receives order for 22 planes in Russia
Boeing, the US manufacturer of commercial aircraft, won an order valued at about
US$3m from the airline Aeroflot for 22 Dreamliner passenger jets in a possible
sign of better US-Russian relations, the International Herald Tribune reported
on June 11th.
Boeing and Aeroflot, which is state-run, signed a contract recently at an
international economic forum in St Petersburg. The first of the 787-8
Dreamliners is to be delivered to Aeroflot in 2014, Valery Okulov, chief
executive of Aeroflot, said after the ceremony.
The Boeing deal had been delayed as relations between the United States and
Russia worsened when US official accused President Vladimir Putin of impeding
democracy. Airbus won a pledge in March from Aeroflot to buy 22 of its A350
passenger jets, valued at US$4.4bn, after competing with Boeing for more than a
year.
The Boeing sale "is hardly a big order, but Airbus needed those
numbers," said Richard Aboulafia, an analyst with Teal Group in Fairfax,
Virginia. "So to deprive Airbus from being the customer is far more
important to Airbus than Boeing."
Aeroflot expects to sign a contract for the Airbus jets during the Paris air
show in June or in August in Moscow.
The US and European aircraft "complement each other well," Okulov
said, adding that delivery of the A350s would being late in 2014 and stretch to
2017.
Aeroflot will seek guarantees from US Export-Import Bank for a syndicated loan
to finance the Boeing deal. The Russian carrier declined to provide details.
Olulov said that Aeroflot, which already was seeking US$1bn to buy a stake in
the Italian airline Alitalia, could afford to borrow more because it had no debt
at present.
Separately, Boeing signed an agreement with Unified Aircraft of Russia to study
cooperation in research, design and development of commercial planes.
Boeing also agreed to increase cooperating with Sukhoi Aviation Holding's
commercial airplane unit. Boeing has consulted Sukhoi Civil Aircraft on its
Superjet-100 family of midrange passenger jets. Boeing will help Sukhoi in
post-sale support.
Aeroflot is the second Russian customer for the Dreamliner S7 Airlines the
second largest Russian carrier, agreed in May to buy 15 of the aircraft with
options for another 10. S7 and Aeroflot are expanding their fleets, with Russian
air travel expected to double by 2015. Russian airlines carried 38 million
passengers last year, up 8.3 per cent from 2005.
Russia spans 11 time zones and travel to more than 60 per cent of its territory
is feasible only by plane. Locally made aircraft are becoming outdated and are
constraining growth of the economy.
«
Top
BANKING
HSBC to open retail branches in Russia
HSBC is looking at opening up new bank branches in Russia after receiving a
retail banking licence that will bolster its presence in one of the last
remaining regions where it lacks scale, the Financial Times reported on June
2nd.
The world's fourth-biggest bank will now be able to expand its operations into
selling credit cards, mortgages and loans to Russian consumers.
Jonathan Hartley, who was recently appointed as HSBC's chief executive in
Russia, said HSBC would look at opening a number of branches - probably less
than 10 - in Russia this year.
Initially this would be in the Moscow area although the location would depend on
finding suitable sites and gaining permission from relevant authorities.
"We see evidence of a fast take-up of consumer finance products from a very
low base," Hartley said.
HSBC plans to expand through offering direct internet and telephone banking
services as well as branches.
HSBC has had corporate and investment banking interests in Russia for some time
but has no retail banking presence in the country, which has a population of
142m and a gross domestic product that increased by more than 6 per cent in
2006.
In the past Stephen Green, HSBC's chairman, has said that HSBC had missed the
expansion of banking in eastern Europe in the 1990s but that the retail banking
market in Russia was "crying out for good-quality service" from
international lenders.
"A number of our competitors are already active there but it is still a
very young market with lots of opportunity. Russia is a place where you can, and
probably should, grow organically," he said earlier this year.
The move comes as HSBC seeks to focus its attention on fast-growing emerging
markets.
Russia planning to simplify M&A procedure for banks
The Russian Finance Ministry has prepared and submitted to the government
amendments to the Civil Code that envision a more simplified procedure for
mergers and absorptions in the banking sphere, Vladimir Lukov, deputy director
of the ministry's financial policy department, said, Interfax News Agency
reported.
The amendments have already been approved by the president's civil legislation
codification council and is currently being polished up by government agencies,
he said. Lukov was unable to say when the amendments would be submitted to the
State Duma. "That depends on the government," he said. The amendments
simplify the procedure for notifying clients, above all legal entities, about
M&A, he said. "This will lead to a reduction in excess credit
organisations (during mergers)," he said.
«
Top
ENERGY
Sintezneftegaz to explore Namibian shelf in 2008
Sintezneftegaz is planning to drill the first search and exploratory well on
the Namibian shelf in the first quarter of 2008, a source in the Sintez Group
said, Interfax News Agency reported.
Sintezneftegaz plans to finish talks in the second half of this year and
reinterpret earlier seismic 2D data in order to plan the construction of the
first well and determine the additional volume of exploratory work, the source
said. Halliburton International Inc. won an auction to be the subcontractor for
the well. Investment in geological exploration work on the shelf will be US$80
million over four years, the source said. Such investment was approved in an
agreement to develop the No. 1711 licensed section signed by the company and
Namibia's Natural Resources and Energy Ministry. Sintezneftegaz received a 70
per cent stake in the project for the geological exploration of the No. 1711
site in March of last year.
Norway mulls idea of gas pipeline from Siberia
Norway is ready to discuss the idea of building a gas pipeline linking Siberia
to the Norwegian Sea for the shipment of Russian natural gas to Europe, but so
far there are no specific plans or proposals on the table, Interfax News Agency
quoted Norwegian Prime Minister, Jens Stoltenberg, as telling a press conference
in Moscow.
"There are no specific plans to build a gas pipeline from Siberia to the
Norwegian Sea, even though the idea has been floated," he said responding
to a question about the pipeline on June 8th.
He said he expected private companies to voice their opinion on the project and
assess its prospects. "As long as there are no concrete proposals, the
Norwegian authorities can do nothing. We should see a concrete proposal,"
Stoltenberg said.
He added that the project was a commercial matter and must be tackled by
companies. "On the Russian side, this will probably be Gazprom, on the
Norwegian - Statoil," he said. It is these companies that should decide
whether it is profitable to transport gas along this route, he said.
Putin propels Bourgas-Alexandroupolis construction
Russian President, Vladimir Putin, has voiced hope for the soonest possible
construction of the Bourgas-Alexandroupolis pipeline. "I think that this
project, which is important not only for our countries, but also for the entire
European energy market, will be implemented within a short time," he told a
press conference on May 31st in Moscow following negotiations with his Greek
counterpart, Karolos Papoulias, Interfax News Agency reported.
Greece is "a key energy partner for Russia. Russia meets 40 percent of
Greek crude needs and 80 percent of Greek gas needs," Interfax quoted him
as saying. "It is possible to enlarge energy cooperation with electric
power," he added. The energy tandem of Russia and Greece is very promising.
"Russia has an impressive energy potential, while Greece has a beneficial
transport structure and geographic location. This tandem certainly has
prospects, in particular, in the provision of European energy security," he
said.
Russia, Greece and Bulgaria need to establish a company to manage the
Bourgas-Alexandroupolis project, Papoulias told the press conference. "This
project will not only be useful for the three states concerned, but will also
make a weighty contribution to the diversification of energy transport routes
and, consequently, the energy security of Europe," he said.
The Bulgarian parliament on May 30 ratified the Bourgas-Alexandroupolis pipeline
deal. Ratification of the agreement by the Russian Duma is expected to take
place over the coming days, while the Greek Parliament has already ratified the
agreement. Representatives of the three countries will soon be meeting in order
to set up the international company that will construct and operate the
pipeline.
Transneft approves increasing ESPO spending by 3.4% in 2007
The board of directors of Transneft at a meeting on May 29th approved additional
spending of 6.8 billion roubles in 2007 to finance the first phase of the
Eastern Siberia-Pacific Ocean (ESPO) pipeline, the company said in a statement,
cited by Interfax News Agency reported.
Transneft plans to use 198.7 billion roubles to finance the ESPO project in
2007, which is almost 130 percent more than the 88 billion roubles in 2006, the
company said in a note to investors for a Eurobond issue in February 2007. Thus,
the ESPO budget for 2007 will increase by 3.4 per cent to 205.5 billion roubles.
Investment is planned at 63.6 billion roubles in 2008.
The board discussed implementing an investment program to build the first phase
of the ESPO pipeline in 2007 and approved the corresponding amendments to the
program, the release read. Transneft will use additional sources from its
subsidiaries for ESPO construction, the release said. Transneft plans to build a
1,254-kilometre section of the pipeline in 2007 and also plans to finance the
construction of seven oil-pumping stations. The company has not announced the
initial budget for building the ESPO in 2007.
Bulgaria ratifies Bourgas-Alexandroupolis agreement
The Bulgarian parliament on May 30th ratified a 280-kilometre, US$1.211-billion
pipeline deal with Russia and Greece to link terminals in the Black Sea and the
Aegean. Ratification of the agreement by the Russian Duma is expected to take
place over the coming days, while the Greek Parliament has already ratified the
agreement. Representatives of the three countries will soon be meeting in order
to set up the international company that will construct and operate the
pipeline, New Europe reported.
The project between Bourgas in Bulgaria and Alexandroupolis in northeastern
Greece would be completed in 2011 with an initial annual capacity of 35 million
tonnes, with a potential for 50 million. It would bypass the congested tanker
route through the Bosporus and bring mostly Caspian fields oil shipped from the
Russian terminal at Novorossiisk to the terminal in the Mediterranean. According
to the three-way agreement initialled in March, Russia would control 51 per cent
of the pipeline operator, with Bulgaria and Greece equally splitting the rest.
The construction, including the 166-kilometres stretch through southeastern
Bulgaria, is scheduled to start this year. The transit fees would be negotiated
at a later date.
Rosneft not ready to ink contract with Sinopec
Russian oil major Rosneft is not yet ready to sign a contract with Sinopec to
ship oil to China through the Naushki border crossing on the Russian-Mongolian
border, despite a drop in railway tariffs, Interfax News Agency quoted Rosneft
President, Sergei Bogdanchikov, as telling reporters in Paris. "This isn't
enough. The economic conditions aren't favourable enough yet to sign a
contract," he said.
The Federal Tariffs Service has approved a 22 per cent discount on shipping oil
by rail to China.
Rosneft and China's UNIPEC, which is the trading company of Sinopec, had planned
to sign a contract to supply up to three million tonnes of oil through the
Naushki border crossing on the Russian-Mongolian border. The contract was
expected to be worth US$ one billion.
Russian Railways (RZD) transported about 10 million tonnes of oil to China in
2006, of which Rosneft accounted for 8.8 million tonnes. Most supplies went
through the Zabaikalsk border crossing.
Beleaguered Russian oil company YUKOS previously used the route through
Mongolia. There are practically no supplies through Naushki at the moment.
Russia inventories all oil wells
The Russian Natural Resource Ministry has carried out a presidential order and
has inventoried all oil wells in the Russian Federation. "The work has been
carried out: 248,000 production wells and 64,000 exploration wells. All the
wells were checked according to their ownership and location," Interfax
News Agency quoted Natural Resource Minister, Yury Trutnev, as saying at a
meeting with Russian President, Vladimir, Putin on May 28th.
"I hope that there are no more that have not been accounted for," he
said in response to a question from Putin. Interfax quoted Trutnev as saying no
wells were omitted, with the exception of those in the Caucasus region, which
were opened about 50 years ago. "These wells are not productive and are not
of any real interest or a real threat. There is nothing left there," he
said. He also said that during the inventory, wells were discovered that
represent an environmental threat. "Funds have been earmarked and this year
and next year Rosnedra will take care of this problem," Trutnev said.
E.ON buys into Russian electricity business
German utility E.ON entered the Russian electricity business on May 24,
establishing a joint venture in the western Siberian area of Tyumen with Russian
partner STS. The venture indicates E.ON chief executive Wulf Bernotat has
shifted his gaze eastwards after a vain takeover struggle for Spanish utility
Endesa, Deutsche-Presse-Agentur (dpa) reported.
The venture, E.ON-STS Energia, is the Dusseldorf-based giant's first electricity
operation on Russian soil, but it has extensive experience with Russia through
its gas wholesaling subsidiary E.ON Ruhrgas. Ruhrgas is closely linked to
Russian gas monopoly Gazprom. E.ON is Germany's biggest utility group.
Bernotat clearly hopes that the liberalised Russian electricity market offers an
investor good returns.
E.ON's brief announcement said, "Russia's market is growing five to six
percent annually, making it one of the biggest and strongest growing markets in
Europe."
Bernotat has often voiced interest in the past in entering the Russian
electricity business and last week said Russia provided "attractive
framework conditions" for an investor.
Analysts have suggested more than US$20 billion must be invested in the next 15
years in new power-generating capacity, modernising existing stations and
upgrading the Russian distribution grid. E.ON has not disclosed how much it is
investing in the Tyumen venture.
However experts on the sector said the outlay would probably come to about one
billion Euro with STS providing assets for the joint venture. TGK-10, a
generating company, will be purchased as part of the deal.
That outlay represents a considerable saving compared to the 40 billion Euro
E.ON contemplated spending on Endesa.
Bernotat is set to brief the public this week on E.ON's strategy, expansion
plans and investment budget, and Russia is now likely to play a big role in the
blueprint. "Our objective is to make E.ON the most effective company in the
European energy business," he said several weeks ago as he unveiled
quarterly figures.
BPS-2 to redirect oil volumes from Druzhba pipeline
The Russian government on May 21 approved the construction of the Baltic
Pipeline System-2 (BPS-2) bypassing Belarus and therefore reducing Russia's
reliance on the transit state. The Russian leadership has pushed for the
Unecha-Primorsk pipeline project since the oil dispute over oil tariffs between
Moscow and Minsk at the beginning of January 2007 that led to a disruption of
oil supplies to Europe from January 8 to 11.
Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Fradkov has signed the corresponding resolution,
the government press service said. The Russian Industry and Energy Ministry and
Transneft have been directed to prepare the necessary documentation for the
construction of the BPS-2. If the project is implemented, the annual throughput
capacity of the Primorsk port may increase to 150 million from 75 million tonnes.
The project has been estimated at US$ two billion.
Nadia Kazakova, an oil and gas analyst at MDM Bank in Moscow, told New Europe on
May 24 that "there is too much dependence on Druzhba crude oil from the
European refineries." The Russian government plans to redirect into the
BPS-2, to Primorsk and then to the Baltic Sea a part of the oil flow from the
Druzhba pipeline that runs from Russia via Belarus and Ukraine to European
refineries.
Moscow wants to reduce its reliance on overland export routes through third
countries. "After the conflicts with Ukraine and Belarus that happened over
the last couple of years, Russia wants to distance itself from these countries
and obviously and very understandably try to invest in new pipelines,"
Anisa Redman, an oil and gas analyst with HSBC Bank in London, told New Europe
on May 22.
"The question is the cost of the new pipelines because the pipelines that
go through Russia and Ukraine are already in place, have been built and are
ready to use, but the new pipelines that Russia is planning to build will
require new assets so there is a trade off; you have to pay for having that
extra new pipeline."
The Russian government plans to build BPS-2 has worried Belarus that counts on
the transit fees that Druzhba oil supplies may be reduced to a mere trickle.
"Belarus' position is threatened because the country earns a lot of hard
currency revenues from that oil and gas transit from Russia and Belarus is
obviously very worried about it," Redman said. She noted, however, that
Russia does not plan to replace Druzhba altogether. "You can't replace it
altogether because it is not going to be large enough of a pipeline, but they
can start to do it and divert some of that crude flow that goes through Belarus
onto other pipelines."
Kazakova said there will be extra capacity for the new pipeline. "I view it
as extra capacity rather than replacement capacity because you still have to use
the current infrastructure (Druzhba) and I can't see why except for political
reasons the current system won't be used," she said.
Russia will not give up on the Druzhba pipeline, but redirect some oil crude
deliveries as well as new oil supplies through BPS-2. State-run oil pipeline
operator Transneft has said that the oil flow through Druzhba would be divided
into two streams, one continuing westward and another heading northward to
Primorsk.
Gazprom to invest another US$3.4bn in Sakhalin-II
Gazprom, which bought a controlling stock interest in the Sakhalin-II project in
April, will invest an additional US$3.4 billion in the project before 2014, the
company said in a memorandum for a new Eurobond issue. Gazprom completed a
transaction on the purchase of a stake of 50 per cent plus one share in Sakhalin
Energy, the operator of the Sakhalin-II project, at the end of April for US$7.45
billion.
Also in April, the company's supervisory council approved an estimate of US$19.4
billion for capital expenditures on the realization of the second stage of the
Sakhalin-II project for the period until 2014. A total of US$13.4 billion in
investment has already been spent and the project is 80 per cent completed,
Gazprom said. The company also noted in the memorandum that no environmental
fines or other penalties had been imposed on the project as of May 18, the date
the memorandum was released.
«
Top
MINERALS & METALS
Norilsk Nickel to spin energy assets off
The board of directors of MMC Norilsk Nickel at its meeting on May 15, 2007
agreed to form a new company on the basis of Norilsk Nickel's non-core energy
assets, the Russian metals giant said in a press release, cited by Interfax.
The restructuring will be carried out as a spin-off of these assets, and the
shares of the new independent company will be distributed on a proportional
basis among shareholders of MMC Norilsk Nickel, the release said.
Only non-strategic energy assets - those not engaged in power supply to the
Company's production facilities in Norilsk - will be subject to the spin-off.
The final list of assets to be spun off will be prepared later this year, by
August - September.
"As a result of this spin-off, the largest private energy company in Russia
will be created, so the restructuring will increase the shareholder's value of
MMC Norilsk Nickel. And what is more, the spin-off of these non-core assets will
allow management to focus on core business," Andrey Klishas, the board
chairman, was quoted as saying.
Such reorganisation is not new to MMC Norilsk Nickel: in 2005 - 2006 the
Company's gold assets were successfully spun-off into Polyus Gold. In accordance
with the spin-off schedule approved by the board of directors, if shareholders
of MMC Norilsk Nickel vote for the reorganization in December, the new company
may be registered before the end of 2007, and its shares will be listed in the
first quarter of 2008, the release said.
Earlier it was thought the listing might take place during the first half of
2008.
The new company is being set up in the framework of the asset split agreed upon
by the company's co-owners Mikhail Prokhorov and Vladimir Potanin at the
beginning of this year. It is expected that Prokhorov will consolidate a
controlling interest in the new energy company and that Potanin will control MMC
Norilsk Nickel as the result of the asset split.
MMC Norilsk Nickel values the energy sector assets that will be spun off at
US$6.7 billion. The company has said it might hand a certain amount of cash to
the independent company, and that a decision on this could be reached by August.
The valuation does not include the potential 62.9 percent interest that the
company could own in the OGK-3 generating company. MMC Norilsk Nickel could
increase its stake in the genco to 62.9 percent from 46.2 percent as the result
of an offer to buy out minority shareholders. The power assets will be spun off
according to the same basis as gold assets were spun off to Polyus Gold, which
went on to become Russia's biggest gold producer, in 2005-2006.
In other words, Norilsk Nickel's shareholders will receive shares in the new
power company in proportion to their stakes in Norilsk Nickel. The power company
should issue level-one American Depositary Receipts (ADR) and be listed on the
Russian Trading System (RTS) and MICEX Stock Exchange.
Norilsk Nickel put 10 billion roubles cash at Polyus Gold's disposal when the
latter was spun off.
« Top
|