|
Books on Libya

REPUBLICAN REFERENCE
Area (sq.km)
1,759,540
Population
5,499,074
Capital
Tripoli
Currency
Libyan dinar
Leader
Col Mu'amar al-Qadhafi
|
Update No: 014 - (01/01/05)
2004, Libya's Gamble From Ideology to
Pragmatism
There is no doubt that 2004 will be remembered as a milestone year in Libya;
a year to be remembered alongside 1969 when the short lived Sanusi dynasty was
deposed by a young officer named Mo'ammar Al-Qadhafi and a small group of 'free
officers'' inspired by the Arab nationalism of Gamal Abdel Nasser then president
of Egypt. It will also be remembered as the antithesis of 1986 and 1992 when US
sanctions and a full-scale UN embargo respectively were imposed. The first was a
response to Libyan support for anti-American terrorism in Europe. The second was
imposed to force to trial two Libyan intelligence officers Abdelbaset Ali
Mohamed al-Megrahi and Lamine Fehima identified as the prime suspects in the
bombing of a Pan Am Boeing 747 over Lockerbie Scotland in December 1988. In 2004
not only did Libya regain its place in the international establishment, it has
been courted by some the world's most influential nations including the United
States. Libya's 2004 equivalent of Glasnost and Perestroika comes at a most
unusual period in relations between the West and the Arab world. It is truly a
remarkable process, as it has been developing ever more actively at a time when
relations between the rest of the Arab world and the West have worsened over the
US led war in Iraq. Not long ago, a fiery Qadhafi would have adamantly defended
Arab nationalism and supported verbally - if not more directly - the Iraqi
resistance against the occupation. Today, not only is America directly involved
in a conflict against no less than one of the most historically and symbolically
significant Arab states, but prospects for peace between Israelis and Arabs have
never seemed worse (though there may be an opening - see Syria).
Indeed, the current crisis in relations between the West and the Islamic World
would once have provided plenty of fodder for the firebrand rhetoric of vintage
Qadhafi. It is, nonetheless typical of Gadhafi's contrarian attitude, that while
the rest of the Arab world tries to minimize its relations with the United
States - or at least hide them from public opinion - the Libyan Jamahiriya has
not had better relations with the superpower in decades. Earlier in the year,
King Abdallah of Jordan cancelled a visit to Washington in protest over Bush's
wholesale backing of Sharon's unilateral plan for withdrawing from Gaza while
formalizing Israeli settlements in the West Bank. Meanwhile, businessmen and US
diplomats were in Tripoli signing contracts and deals for a big piece of Libyan
oil. Ordinarily, Arab governments fear reprisals from their populations when
they make too many concessions to the West, Saudi Arabia having perhaps provided
the most striking example during the nineties. Therefore, it is fair to wonder
about the wisdom of Qadhafi's opening or 'infitah' in terms of stability - do
these reforms not change the image of Qadhafi as someone who stands up to the
West? In fact, the Libyan reforms announced by Prime Minister Shukry Ghanem,
which emphasized the re-establishment of relations with the West, have not yet
involved the economic re-structuring of the Libyan Jamahiriya, which would
ostensibly transform it into a free market economy. However, last month, Ghanem
announced that subsidies for basic staple foods and household goods would be
repealed. The subsidies issue is in fact very sensitive and could be the first
real test of Ghadafi's reforms in the next year. Typically, Libyans are less
likely to protest and challenge Qadhafi over ideological matters than practical
issues and the Libyan regime's legitimacy rests on its distributive capacity.
The most serious challenges to the regime have, not surprisingly, developed
during crucial economic downturns and as a response to attempts to lift
subsidies as happened in 1988-89. The Libyan economy is still very heavily
dependent on oil exploration, and the free market is not sufficiently
diversified to make a significant contribution to the overall economy. Despite
the reformist rhetoric, Libya needs more oil. Years of sanctions, meant that the
crucial resource was becoming more difficult to extract from a technical
standpoint. Fresh exploration needed to find new sources and set up new wells
for exploitation, needing the investment and equipment of foreign companies. It
was therefore necessary for Col. Qadhafi to do everything possible to his
country's international standing.
It is remarkable that the change has occurred so quickly and efficiently. Col.
Qadhafi, was visited by no less than Prime Minister Blair, prime Minister
Berlusconi of Italy, President Jacques Chirac of France, Chancellor Gerhard
Schroeder of Germany and high officials from the US state Department, who have
been actively working to re-establish full diplomatic relations. A few days
later on April 26th, Qadhafi visited the European Union Headquarters culminating
the diplomatic manoeuvring to put Libya in the good graces of the West, which
began with the acceptance of responsibility for the crash of Pan Am 103 at
Lockerbie, Scotland in December 1988. In November, it was announced that the US
has chosen the site upon which to build its diplomatic mission in Tripoli. There
remain few official and bureaucratic obstacles to prevent American companies
from pursuing regular and profitable business in Libya now. In December, the
United States released Libya's funds frozen in the United States since 1986
amounting to about $1 billion. There was only one snag in the positive chain of
events that have even enabled President Bush to hail Libya and its leader as
examples of responsible leadership in the Arab world. There have been repeated
stories of a Libyan attempt to assassinate the Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah. The
rumours reached their peak in July and threatened to undo all the diplomatic
breakthroughs that had taken place in 2004. Some critics suggested that it was
premature to lift the US sanctions, on April 23rd, imposed under the ILSA (Iran
Libya Sanctions Act) allowing US oil firms to sign exploration deals in Libya.
Nevertheless, while the story persisted throughout the fall, it has faded into
the background and the Halliburton employees can continue to arrive in Tripoli
airport with the full confidence that their company is now legally sanctioned to
facilitate a new wave of oil exploration in Libya.
Remaining challenges - Human Rights
The fading of the Saudi murder plot story has certainly enabled the
diplomatic restoration of Libya to continue, but there are pending diplomatic
issues that need resolution in 2005. One of the more important one involves the
fate of five Bulgarian nurses and a Palestinian doctor sentenced to death
because a Libyan court found them guilty of having deliberately infected 400
children with the HIV virus in 1997 at a Benghazi hospital. The evidence against
the Bulgarian medical staff and some questionable confessions to the crime are
widely believed to have been extracted through torture. The sentence demands the
doctor and the nurses be put to death by firing squad. Human rights
organizations have widely condemned it suggesting that Libya has not changed its
ways and that it remains a repressive society. Most observers believe that
Libyan authorities have been scapegoating the nurses rather than admit their own
negligence. Nevertheless, the Libyan government has perhaps not neglected the
potential public relations disaster the sentence could produce if it were
carried out. The foreign minister Abdul-Rahman Shalgam announced that Libya was
ready to reconsider the sentence if Bulgaria offered compensation to the
families and financed the construction of a hospital. The offer itself may yet
present unworkable elements, as the offer of compensation would still imply an
admission of guilt and excludes the Palestinian doctor. Nevertheless, the offer
has come directly from the foreign affairs minister and has transformed it into
a political issue, whose outcome no longer rests with the court. Another issue
of contention with human rights groups has been the condition and treatment of
African migrants in Libya. Libya's wide-open desert borders have allowed
migrants from countries such as Ghana, Sierra Leone, Ethiopia, Somalia, Niger,
Chad, Sudan and beyond to come to Libya in search of what the migrants hoped
would be better paying jobs. The problem was encouraged by the fact that Colonel
Qadhafi had shifted focus from a pan-Arab perspective to a Pan-African one in
the late 90's. Libya presented itself as an African country and Qadhafi had
promoted Tripoli as a spiritual capital of an unrealised United States of
Africa. Libya itself has been under pressure from Europe, notably Italy, to
control its borders because many of the African migrants are finding conditions
too tough in Libya and often can't return to their home countries because,
ironically, they need to pay for an exit visa from Libya to leave - the exit
visa is yet another source of contention for human rights groups. Many migrants
then choose to risk their life crossing the Mediterranean in precarious boats to
reach the Italian island of Lampedusa. Many do not make it and often drown.
Italy's conservative government lead by Prime Minister Berlusconi is under
pressure from xenophobic elements in his government to curb illegal immigration.
In the late summer, Berlusconi offered to help Libya build detention centres in
the Libyan desert to stop the migrants from reaching the shores in the first
place. While Libya has neither agreed nor declined, the European Union will
continue to apply pressure on Libya to curb African immigration and policies to
this end will no doubt remain a key issue in Libya's relations with Europe in
2005.
« Top
|